Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

Qualitative study to develop processes and tools for the assessment and tracking of African institutions' capacity for operational health research.

Wallis, S and Cole, DC and Gaye, O and Mmbaga, BT and Mwapasa, V and Tagbor, H and Bates, I (2017) Qualitative study to develop processes and tools for the assessment and tracking of African institutions' capacity for operational health research. BMJ Open, 7 (9). ISSN 2044-6055

[img]
Preview
Text
Qualitative study to develop processes and tools for the assessment and tracking of African institutions' capacity for operational health research..pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (407kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Research is key to achieving global development goals. Our objectives were to develop and test an evidence-informed process for assessing health research management and support systems (RMSS) in four African universities and for tracking interventions to address capacity gaps. SETTING: Four African universities. PARTICIPANTS: 83 university staff and students from 11 cadres. INTERVENTION/METHODS: A literature-informed 'benchmark' was developed and used to itemise all components of a university's health RMSS. Data on all components were collected during site visits to four African universities using interview guides, document reviews and facilities observation guides. Gaps in RMSS capacity were identified against the benchmark and institutional action plans developed to remedy gaps. Progress against indicators was tracked over 15 months and common challenges and successes identified. RESULTS: Common gaps in operational health research capacity included no accessible research strategy, a lack of research e-tracking capability and inadequate quality checks for proposal submissions and contracts. Feedback indicated that the capacity assessment was comprehensive and generated practical actions, several of which were no-cost. Regular follow-up helped to maintain focus on activities to strengthen health research capacity in the face of challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of each institutions' strengths and weaknesses against an evidence-informed benchmark enabled them to identify gaps in in their operational health research systems, to develop prioritised action plans, to justify resource requests to fulfil the plans and to track progress in strengthening RMSS. Use of a standard benchmark, approach and tools enabled comparisons across institutions which has accelerated production of evidence about the science of research capacity strengthening. The tools could be used by institutions seeking to understand their strengths and to address gaps in research capacity. Research capacity gaps that were common to several institutions could be a 'smart' investment for governments and health research funders.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Evaluation; Institutional Practices; Research Activities; Systems Analysis
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Public Health Institute
Publisher: BMJ Publishing
Related URLs:
Date Deposited: 08 Nov 2017 11:26
Last Modified: 08 Nov 2017 11:26
DOI or Identification number: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016660
URI: http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/7489

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item