Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

Effects and Dose-Response Relationships of Motor Imagery Practice on Strength Development in Healthy Adult Population

Paravlic, A, Slimani, M, Tod, DA, Marusic, U, Milanovic, Z and Pisot, R Effects and Dose-Response Relationships of Motor Imagery Practice on Strength Development in Healthy Adult Population. Sports Medicine. ISSN 0112-1642 (Accepted)

[img] Text
III Revision_Motor Imagery and SD_clean copy.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (745kB)

Abstract

Background Motor imagery (MI), a mental simulation of a movement without overt muscle contraction, has been largely used to improve general motor tasks. However, the effects of MI practice on maximal voluntary strength (MVS) remain equivocal.
Objectives The aim of this meta-analysis was to: (1) estimate whether MI practice intervention can meaningfully improve MVS in healthy adults; (2) compare the effects of MI practice on MVS with its combination with physical practice (MI-C), and with physical practice (PP) training alone; (3) investigate the dose-response relationships of MI practice.
Data Sources and Study Eligibility Seven electronic databases were searched up to April 2017. Initially 717 studies were identified, however, after evaluation of the study characteristics, data from 13 articles involving 370 participants were extracted. The meta-analysis was completed on MVS as the primary parameter. In addition, parameters associated with training volume, training intensity, and time spent training, were used to investigate dose-response relationships.
Results MI practice moderately improved MVS. When compared to conventional PP, effects were of small benefit in favour of PP. MI-C when compared to PP showed unclear effects. MI practice produced moderate effects in both upper and lower extremities on MVS. Cortical representation area of the involved muscles did not modify the effects. Meta-regression analysis revealed that: (a) a training period of four weeks, (b) a frequency of three times per week, (c) two to three sets per single session, (d) 25 repetitions per single set, and (e) session duration of 15 minutes, were associated with enhanced improvements in muscle strength following MI practice. Similar dose-response relationships were observed following MI and PP.
Conclusions The present meta-analysis demonstrates that compared to a no-exercise control group of healthy adults, MI practice increases MVS, but less than PP. These findings suggest that MI practice could be considered as a substitutional or additional training tool to preserve muscle function when athletes are not exposed to maximal training intensities.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 1106 Human Movement And Sports Science, 0913 Mechanical Engineering, 1302 Curriculum And Pedagogy
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine
Divisions: Sport & Exercise Sciences
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Date Deposited: 27 Feb 2018 11:12
Last Modified: 14 Sep 2018 11:41
URI: http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/8134

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item