Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

An assessment of the dimensionality and factorial structure of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale

Drinkwater, K, Denovan, A, Dagnall, N and Parker, A (2017) An assessment of the dimensionality and factorial structure of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.

An Assessment of the Dimensionality and Factorial Structure of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview


Since its introduction, the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale (RPBS) has developed into a principal measure of belief in the paranormal. Accordingly, the RPBS regularly appears within parapsychological research. Despite common usage, academic debates continue to focus on the factorial structure of the RPBS and its psychometric integrity. Using an aggregated heterogeneous sample (N = 3,764), the present study tested the fit of 10 factorial models encompassing variants of the most commonly proposed solutions (seven, five, two, and one-factor) plus new bifactor alternatives. A comparison of competing models revealed a seven-factor bifactor solution possessed superior data-model fit (CFI = 0.945, TLI = 0.933, IFI = 0.945, SRMR = 0.046, RMSEA = 0.058), containing strong factor loadings for a general factor and weaker, albeit acceptable, factor loadings for seven subfactors. This indicated that belief in the paranormal, as measured by the RPBS, is best characterized as a single overarching construct, comprising several related, but conceptually independent subfactors. Furthermore, women reported significantly higher paranormal belief scores than men, and tests of invariance indicated that mean differences in gender are unlikely to reflect measurement bias. Results indicate that despite concerns about the content and psychometric integrity of the RPBS the measure functions well at both a global and seven-factor level. Indeed, the original seven-factors contaminate alternative solutions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: belief in the paranormal; bifactor model; composite reliability; confirmatory factor analysis; revised paranormal belief scale; 1701 Psychology; 1702 Cognitive Sciences
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Psychology (from Sep 2019)
Publisher: Frontiers Media
SWORD Depositor: A Symplectic
Date Deposited: 17 Jun 2024 11:55
Last Modified: 17 Jun 2024 12:00
DOI or ID number: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01693
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/23576
View Item View Item