From Handwork to Human Capital: A Discourse Analysis of Design and Technology Education Policy in England, 1900 to the Present

McLain, M ORCID: 0000-0002-8691-3155 From Handwork to Human Capital: A Discourse Analysis of Design and Technology Education Policy in England, 1900 to the Present. In: PATT43 Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Research Proceedings , 43. (PATT43: The 43rd International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Research Conference, 15th - 18th Jun 26, Swedish National Centre for School Technology Education (Cetis) and Technology and Science Education Research (TekNaD), Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden). (Accepted)

Text From Handwork to Human Capital.pdf - Accepted Version Access Restricted until 18 June 2026. Download (325kB)

Abstract

This paper offers a critical discourse analysis informed discussion of UK policy texts that have shaped design and technology (D&T) education in England from the early twentieth century to the present, drawing exclusively on the provided annotated corpus of Acts, statutory orders, curriculum documents, and white papers. Treating these texts as discursive artefacts, the analysis traces how D&T has been problem‑framed, how learners and teachers have been constructed, and which policy levers (statutory status, accountability measures, and assessment architectures) have materialised these framings in schools. Five eras are identified: (i) handwork for character and citizenship (1904–1918); (ii) post‑war technical modernity (1944-1949); (iii) the invention of D&T as design capability within the national curriculum for England (1988-1999); (iv) standards, choice, and accountability with the marginalisation of non-English Baccalaureate subjects (2002-2016); and (v) skills/productivity and technical pathways (2016-present). The corpus also evidences the consolidation of statutory frameworks (1996), primary‑phase turbulence (2009), and the reconfiguration of vocational pathways (2011). A sustained policy contradiction is visible: economic and skills strategies valorise design and technical capability, while accountability regimes simultaneously decentre D&T at Key Stage 4. A coherent national settlement requires realigning performance measures or restoring statutory guarantees, so school‑level incentives match national ambitions.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	accountability; Liverpool Institute for Research in Education (LIFE); curriculum policy; design and technology; discourse analysis; England; national curriculum; policymaking
Subjects:	L Education > LB Theory and practice of education L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education N Fine Arts > NC Drawing Design Illustration T Technology > T Technology (General)
Divisions:	Education
Publisher:	Liverpool John Moores University
Date of acceptance:	15 April 2026
Date Deposited:	15 Apr 2026 15:27
Last Modified:	15 Apr 2026 15:27
URI:	https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/28385

View Item