Open Justice and Hidden Harm: The Experiences of Children and Families Impacted by Parental Imprisonment When Parental Crime Is Reported

Brookes, L ORCID: 0000-0002-2628-9215, Yeoman, F ORCID: 0000-0002-5024-9571 and McCooey, T ORCID: 0009-0002-0401-6985 (2026) Open Justice and Hidden Harm: The Experiences of Children and Families Impacted by Parental Imprisonment When Parental Crime Is Reported. Social Sciences, 15 (7). ISSN 2076-0760

Preview

Text Open Justice and Hidden Harm.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (311kB) | Preview

Abstract

Children of imprisoned parents, who are often described as ‘orphans of justice’, suffer a multitude of disadvantages when a parent is sent to prison. Whilst their experiences of loss, stigma, and social exclusion are well documented, one area that remains critically under-examined is how court reporting processes may further exacerbate these harms. This study explores the lived experience of children 11–17 years (n = 6) who had experienced parental imprisonment, and non-offending adults (parents, caregivers, and adult children of offenders/n = 6) in relation to their experiences of parental crime reported in the press. This study also integrates views from individual interviews conducted with journalists and press regulators (n = 5), as well as data from a content analysis of three regional and two national newspapers across a three-week period. Findings indicate that current court reporting practices can be, for some children and family members, a contributing factor to their difficulties. Participating children and family members assert that publishing partial home addresses and references to family relationships heightens their visibility in the community, which they say contributes to community backlash and negatively affects their physical and mental wellbeing. The content analysis (n = 186 custody related news reports) showed selective disclosure of offenders’ personal and family details. Interviewed journalists strongly defended the principle of open justice and felt legally unable to add the wider context families often wished to share. However, they expressed genuine sympathy for the children, and while resistant to new legal restrictions, were open to developing voluntary guidance to help reduce harm where possible. This study proposes an integrated framework to strengthen ethical journalism and better protect children impacted by parental imprisonment, calling for improved public information, trauma-informed education, participatory research and practitioner tools that centre children’s rights. It argues that open justice must be balanced with relational accountability, ensuring open justice does not come at the expense of children’s wellbeing.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	48 Law and Legal Studies; 4805 Legal Systems; 4402 Criminology; 44 Human Society; Pediatric Research Initiative; Behavioral and Social Science; Violence Research; 7.1 Individual care needs; Generic health relevance; 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions; 16 Studies in Human Society; 18 Law and Legal Studies; 44 Human society; 48 Law and legal studies
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology > HV8301 Penology. Prisons. Corrections
Divisions:	Art and Creative Industries Education
Publisher:	MDPI AG
Date of acceptance:	17 June 2026
Date of first compliant Open Access:	21 July 2026
Date Deposited:	21 Jul 2026 14:22
Last Modified:	21 Jul 2026 14:22
DOI or ID number:	10.3390/socsci15070440
URI:	https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/29035

View Item