Sex Differences in Macrovascular Responsiveness: Acute Effects of Hot Water Immersion vs. Aerobic Exercise in Overweight Older Adults

Costa, JG, Locatelli, JC, Wigati, KW, Naylor, LH, Haynes, A, Jones, H orcid iconORCID: 0000-0001-8282-1459 and Green, DJ Sex Differences in Macrovascular Responsiveness: Acute Effects of Hot Water Immersion vs. Aerobic Exercise in Overweight Older Adults. Experimental Physiology. ISSN 0958-0670 (Accepted)

[thumbnail of 2026 Costa - Sex Differences in Macrovascular Responsiveness Acute Effects of Hot Water Immersion vs. Aerobic Exercise in Overweight Older Adults.pdf] Text
2026 Costa - Sex Differences in Macrovascular Responsiveness Acute Effects of Hot Water Immersion vs. Aerobic Exercise in Overweight Older Adults.pdf - Accepted Version
Access Restricted
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (338kB)

Abstract

Recent studies have focused on the potential benefits of heat exposure for cardiovascular health. However, the acute effects of heat therapy on conduit arteries remain unclear, particularly in overweight and obese older males and females. This study aimed to compare core temperature (Tc), heart rate (HR), and brachial, femoral, and carotid artery diameter and velocity (Doppler ultrasound) responses to an acute exercise (EXE) session versus hot water immersion (HWI), and to determine whether physiological responses are sex-dependent. Twenty-five overweight older adults (10♂/15♀; age:59±7, BMI:29.4±3.4kg/m2) underwent two experimental sessions (30 minutes): EXE (60-70%HRmax) and HWI(40°C). HWI resulted in a larger increase in Tc across the session with the largest difference at 30 minutes (0.9±0.3 vs 0.7±0.3°C;p=0.024). No differences were observed in Tc between males and females (interaction p=0.271). HWI induced a lower rise in HR (♂40±18 vs ♀51±12bpm at 30 mins;p=0.013) than EXE, and females exhibited a larger change in HR after HWI than males (♂27±12 vs ♀48±17bpm;p=0.003). HWI also induced a larger reduction in systolic (-6±10 vs 1±7mmHg;p=0.012) and diastolic BP (-10±9 vs -2±5mmHg;p=0.001) than EXE, but with no sex differences. HWI induced a larger increase in brachial diameter, brachial and femoral velocity, brachial and femoral flow, and shear rate than EXE. Females exhibited significantly higher change in femoral velocity (♀26±8 vs ♂17±6cm/s;p=0.011) and shear rate (♀157±55 vs ♂98±38cm/s;p=0.008) in response to HWI than males. A single session of HWI induced larger vascular responses than exercise. Males and females both benefit, but somewhat differently and possibly via different mechanisms.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 0606 Physiology; 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences; 1116 Medical Physiology; Physiology; 3109 Zoology; 3208 Medical physiology; 4207 Sports science and exercise
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine
Divisions: Sport and Exercise Sciences
Publisher: Wiley
Date of acceptance: 17 July 2026
Date Deposited: 02 Sep 2026 13:47
Last Modified: 02 Sep 2026 13:47
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/29289
View Item View Item