The effect of camera configuration on multi-camera markerless motion capture for biomechanical analysis

Walker, R ORCID: 0000-0001-6271-2271, Robinson, MA ORCID: 0000-0002-5627-492X, Outerleys, J, McKenzie, L, Janecic, S, Vargas, NF, Sumner, S, Winterbone, N, Lee, YH, Gibbon, KC ORCID: 0009-0003-3096-0918 and Foster, RJ ORCID: 0000-0003-2410-9839 (2026) The effect of camera configuration on multi-camera markerless motion capture for biomechanical analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 206. ISSN 0021-9290

Preview

Text The effect of camera configuration on multi camera markerless motion capture for biomechanical analysis.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (7MB) | Preview

Abstract

Markerless motion capture technology, such as Theia3D, enables human movement data to be collected outside traditional laboratory environments. However, the extent to which changes in camera configuration influence markerless kinematic output remains underreported. This study evaluated the effect of camera configuration on Theia3D-calculated kinematic parameters during walking, running, and jumping. Ten healthy adults completed five trials of walking, running and counter movement jumps in two volume sizes (10 x 8 m and 6 x 4 m). Movements were captured with eighteen Sony-RX0II synchronised video cameras, which were systematically selected to generate three camera configurations (18-cameras, 12-cameras and 6-cameras), then processed in Theia3D (v2024.1.17). Trunk, pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics were compared across sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes using one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping. Changes in camera configuration produced mean differences of < 2° during walking, < 4° during running, and < 3° during countermovement jumps. Largest differences were shown for all movements between 18 and 12-camera and 12 and 6-camera configurations in the larger (10 x 8 m) volume. Smallest differences were shown between the 18 and 12 camera configurations in the smaller (6 x 4 m) volume during counter movement jumps. This work demonstrated minimal effects of varying camera configurations on Theia3D markerless kinematics during walking, running and jumping. Camera placement was likely an important factor where small differences were identified. Overall, these findings indicate that Theia3D-derived kinematics are minimally affected by changes in camera configuration during walking, running, and jumping, supporting its use in environments where camera number and space may be constrained.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Markerless motion capture; Theia3D; Camera configuration; Camera configuration; Markerless motion capture; Theia3D; Humans; Motion Capture; Biomechanical Phenomena; Walking; Adult; Male; Running; Female; Video Recording; Young Adult; Movement; 4201 Allied Health and Rehabilitation Science; 42 Health Sciences; 4207 Sports Science and Exercise; Clinical Research; Rehabilitation; Humans; Motion Capture; Biomechanical Phenomena; Walking; Adult; Male; Running; Female; Video Recording; Young Adult; Movement; 0903 Biomedical Engineering; 0913 Mechanical Engineering; 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences; Biomedical Engineering; 4003 Biomedical engineering; 4207 Sports science and exercise
Subjects:	R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV561 Sports
Divisions:	Sport and Exercise Sciences
Publisher:	Elsevier
Date of acceptance:	12 August 2026
Date of first compliant Open Access:	21 September 2026
Date Deposited:	21 Sep 2026 12:51
Last Modified:	21 Sep 2026 12:51
DOI or ID number:	10.1016/j.jbiomech.2026.113522
URI:	https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/29482

View Item