Political responses to a second Scottish independence referendum: Deferral, denial and delegitimisation

Brown Swan, C orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-7448-5966 and Anderson, P orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-8156-5542 (2026) Political responses to a second Scottish independence referendum: Deferral, denial and delegitimisation. Global Constitutionalism. pp. 1-19. ISSN 2045-3817

[thumbnail of political-responses-to-a-second-scottish-independence-referendum-deferral-denial-and-delegitimisation.pdf]
Preview
Text
political-responses-to-a-second-scottish-independence-referendum-deferral-denial-and-delegitimisation.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (354kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper examines how the UK state has responded to Scottish demands for a second independence referendum, treating those demands as constitutional contestation and asking whether the state has converted that contestation into deliberative engagement or managed it through deferral, denial, and delegitimisation. Drawing on a longitudinal analysis of ministerial discourse between 2016 and 2026, the paper traces how successive UK Governments – Conservative and Labour – have justified their consistent refusal to sanction a second referendum. It identifies three overlapping phases: conditional deferral under Theresa May, in which the question was postponed around Brexit; assertive denial under Johnson, Truss and Sunak, in which crisis conditions were instrumentalised and the 2022 Supreme Court ruling used to normalise refusal; and managed delegitimisation under Starmer, in which a softer tone masked an effort to render independence constitutionally illegitimate. The UK state has deployed a consistent repertoire – democratic finality, crisis conditions, mandate contestation – to close off rather than structure debate. The paper concludes that while these strategies have prevented a second referendum, they have not resolved the underlying tension, raising fundamental questions about deliberation and democratic legitimacy in multinational states.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 1606 Political Science; 1801 Law; 4408 Political science; 4803 International and comparative law; 4807 Public law
Subjects: J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain
J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN1187 Scotland
K Law > KD England and Wales > KDC Scotland
Divisions: Humanities and Social Science
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date of acceptance: 18 August 2026
Date of first compliant Open Access: 6 October 2026
Date Deposited: 06 Oct 2026 07:26
Last Modified: 06 Oct 2026 08:59
DOI or ID number: 10.1017/s2045381726100458
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/29614
View Item View Item