Employer brand image and job application intention under digital discrimination expectations: A gender-moderated conceptual model

Sarp, S, Bozkurt, S and Aydin, E orcid iconORCID: 0000-0003-2530-9058 (2026) Employer brand image and job application intention under digital discrimination expectations: A gender-moderated conceptual model. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 14 (3). pp. 1892-1911. ISSN 2148-2586

[thumbnail of Employer brand image and job application intention under digital discrimination expectations_ A gender-moderated conceptual model.pdf]
Preview
Text
Employer brand image and job application intention under digital discrimination expectations_ A gender-moderated conceptual model.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (564kB) | Preview

Abstract

Digital recruitment increasingly relies on algorithmic screening and digital-footprint review, raising applicant concerns about biased evaluation. Drawing on signaling theory and on work in social identity threat, this conceptual paper examines the relationship between employer brand image and job application intention. It focuses on conditions of anticipated digital discrimination. Digital discrimination expectation refers to applicants' anticipation that an organization's algorithmic screening and digital footprint practices will disadvantage them based on a protected characteristic. We propose that this expectation weakens the positive relationship between employer brand image and job application intention. Employer brand communication is produced by the employer, and applicants who expect an unfair process have reason to discount it. We further propose that this weakening is more pronounced for female applicants, reflecting differential exposure to discrimination rather than an inherent gender trait. The study contributes to employer branding and recruitment literature. It offers new theoretical insight into how job seekers decide within technology-driven and potentially inequitable hiring systems. It also outlines directions for future empirical validation.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA76 Computer software
T Technology > T Technology (General) > T58.5 Information Technology
Divisions: Liverpool Business School
Publisher: ACC Publishing
Date of acceptance: 15 September 2026
Date of first compliant Open Access: 22 October 2026
Date Deposited: 22 Oct 2026 11:02
Last Modified: 22 Oct 2026 11:02
DOI or ID number: 10.15295/bmij.v14i3.2787
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/29729
View Item View Item