Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

Systematic review of the methods used in economic evaluations of targeted physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions

Cochrane, MA, Watson, PM, Timpson, H, Haycox, A, Collins, B, Jones, L, Martin, A and Graves, LEF (2019) Systematic review of the methods used in economic evaluations of targeted physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions. Social Science and Medicine. ISSN 0277-9536

[img] Text
Systematic review of the methods used in economic evaluations of targeted.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 27 April 2020.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (722kB)

Abstract

The burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCD) on health systems worldwide is substantial. Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are major risk factors for NCD. Previous attempts to understand the value for money of preventative interventions targeting physically inactive individuals have proved to be challenging due to key methodological challenges associated with the conduct of economic evaluations in public health. A systematic review was carried out across six databases (Medline, SPORTSDiscus, EconLit, PsychINFO, NHS EED, HTA) along with supplementary searches. The review examines how economic evaluations published between 2009-March 2017 have addressed methodological challenges with the aim of bringing to light examples of good practice for future studies. Fifteen economic evaluations from four high-income countries were retrieved; there is a dearth of studies targeting sedentary behaviour as an independent risk factor from physical activity. Comparability of studies from the healthcare and societal perspectives were limited due to analysts’ choice in cost categories, valuation technique and time horizon differing substantially. The scarcity of and inconsistencies across economic evaluations for these two behaviours have exposed a mismatch between calls for more preventative action to tackle NCD and the lack of information available on how resources may be optimally allocated in practice. Consequently, this paper offers a table of recommendations on how future studies can be improved.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1601 Anthropology, 1608 Sociology
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Public Health Institute
Sport & Exercise Sciences
Publisher: Elsevier
Related URLs:
Date Deposited: 01 May 2019 10:26
Last Modified: 01 May 2019 15:30
DOI or Identification number: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.040
URI: http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/10621

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item