Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

'We are still obsessed by this idea of abstinence': A critical analysis of UK news media representations of proposals to introduce drug consumption rooms in Glasgow, UK.

Atkinson, AM, McAuley, A, Trayner, KMA and Sumnall, HR (2019) 'We are still obsessed by this idea of abstinence': A critical analysis of UK news media representations of proposals to introduce drug consumption rooms in Glasgow, UK. International Journal of Drug Policy, 68. pp. 62-74. ISSN 0955-3959

[img] Text
'We are still obsessed by this idea of abstinence' A critical analysis of UK news media representations of proposals to introduce drug consumption rooms in Glasgow, UK..pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 16 April 2020.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (689kB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drug consumptions rooms (DCRs) are a well-established and evidence-based harm reduction response to drug use. Recently, a consortium led by health services in Glasgow, United Kingdom (UK), proposed piloting a DCR. In this article, we examine how the proposals were represented in news media reporting, and the possible effects of such reporting. METHODS: A quantitative content and qualitative thematic analysis of UK news media (n = 174 articles) representations of the proposals to introduce DCRs in the city of Glasgow, UK, was conducted. Analysis was informed by Bacchi's (2009, 2012, 2017) approach to policy analysis, 'What's the problem represented to be?' FINDINGS: Competing representations of the 'problem' of injecting drug use (IDU) were contested by a range of actors with different political visions. The applicability of the 'evidence base', potential benefits of DCRs to both users and the public, and the associated economic costs, were presented in differing ways depending on the underlying assumptions and presumptions of the arguments constructed (e.g. harm reduction vs recovery). As a result, a number of conflicting subject positions were presented that may have implications for the way that people who inject drugs (PWID) see themselves, and how they are viewed and treated by society. Whilst proponents positioned DCRs within a discourse of public health, an underlying rhetoric of abstinence and recovery underpinned the arguments against DCRs. It was this latter discourse that underpinned the UK Government's rejection of the proposals, which the Scottish Government were prevented from overruling within the political constraints of their devolved powers, with the lived effect of people who use drugs (PWUD) being denied access to public health services that mitigate harm. CONCLUSION: We conclude that attempts to introduce and gain public and political support for harm reduction responses such as DCRs through the news media face challenges within the historical and political context of prohibitionist UK drugs policy.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, 16 Studies in Human Society
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Divisions: Public Health Institute
Publisher: Elsevier
Related URLs:
Date Deposited: 16 May 2019 12:35
Last Modified: 16 May 2019 12:45
DOI or Identification number: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.03.010
URI: http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/10656

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item