Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

Examining the equivalence between imagery and execution - Do imagined and executed movements code relative environmental features?

Roberts, JW, Wesh, TN and Wakefield, CJ (2019) Examining the equivalence between imagery and execution - Do imagined and executed movements code relative environmental features? Behavioural Brain Research, 370. ISSN 0166-4328

[img] Text
Examining the equivalence between imagery and execution.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 17 May 2020.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (438kB)

Abstract

Imagined actions engage some of the same neural substrates and related sensorimotor codes as executed actions. The equivalency between imagined and executed actions has been frequently demonstrated by the mental and physical chronometry of movements; namely, the imagination and execution of aiming movements in a Fitts paradigm. The present study aimed to examine the nature or extent of this equivalence, and more specifically, whether imagined movements encompass the relative environmental features as do executed movements. In two separate studies, participants completed a series of imagined or executed reciprocal aiming movements between standard control targets (no annuli), perceptually small targets (large annuli) and perceptually large targets (small annuli) (Ebbinghaus illusions). The findings of both studies replicated the standard positive relation between movement time and index of difficulty for imagined and executed movements. Furthermore, movement times were longer for targets with surrounding annuli compared to the movement times without the annuli suggesting a general interference effect. Hence, the surrounding annuli caused a longer time, independent of the illusory target size, most likely to avoid a potential collision and more precisely locate the endpoint. Most importantly, this feature could not be discriminated as a function of the task (imagined vs. executed). These findings lend support to the view of a common domain for imagined and executed actions, while elaborating on the precision of their equivalence.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Divisions: Sports & Exercise Sciences
Publisher: Elsevier
Related URLs:
Date Deposited: 28 Jan 2020 11:58
Last Modified: 28 Jan 2020 12:00
DOI or Identification number: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111951
URI: http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/12114

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item