Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

The Biomechanical Mechanisms of Fall Risk on Stairs with Inconsistent Step Dimensions

Francksen, N (2020) The Biomechanical Mechanisms of Fall Risk on Stairs with Inconsistent Step Dimensions. Doctoral thesis, Liverpool John Moores University.

2020Francksenphd.pdf.pdf - Published Version

Download (3MB) | Preview


Stair falls frequently happen, affecting people of all ages and impact on a person’s independence. Not only do high rises and shallow goings increase the fall risk but inconsistent dimensions are commonly reported in stair fall investigations. Literature speculates that, the mechanistic reasoning behind these falls occur because individuals do not detect the inconsistency and therefore do not adjust their stepping behaviour. However, these hypotheses are based on observations and assumptions derived from normal stepping behaviour on consistent stairs and have not yet been experimentally tested. Therefore, the purpose of this thesis is to empirically test the mechanisms by which inconsistencies in rise and going dimensions could cause falls in younger and older adults. Twenty-six younger adults (24±3 y, 1.74±0.09 m, 71.41±11.04 kg) and thirty-two older adults (70±4 y, 1.68±0.08 m, 67.90±14.10 kg) ascended and descended an instrumented staircase in three conditions: 1) consistent dimensions (all steps riser =200 mm and going =250 mm), 2) inconsistent rise (third step was raised 10 mm, causing the fourth step to have 10 mm reduced riser) and 3) inconsistent going (third step was made 10 mm shorter, causing second step to have a 10 mm increased going). Data were collected from 3D motion capture and force plates embedded in the bottom four steps. Data were used to quantify and compare stepping mechanics and centre of mass control in the consistent condition to that in the inconsistent rise and inconsistent going conditions. In the inconsistent rise condition (Chapter 3), during ascent clearances of both groups were reduced (≈9 mm, F=48.4, p=.001) over the higher step-edge, increasing trip risk. During descent, percentage foot contact lengths decreased (≈2%, F=9.1, p=.004) on the inconsistently higher step for both groups, possibly increasing the risk of a slip. Foot centre of mass (CoM) trajectories during swing prior to contact, revealed that there were no alterations to stepping behaviour prior to contact with the inconsistently higher rise step, causing a magnitude of change that was comparable to the 10 mm manipulation. In the inconsistent going condition (Chapter 4), during descent percentage foot contact lengths of both groups were not significantly different to the consistent condition (≈1%, F=2.5, p=.121). Foot CoM trajectories during swing confirmed that, individuals changed their stepping behaviour in late swing prior to contact with the shorter step, contradicting previous assumptions. Additionally, younger adults then had reduced clearances over the inconsistently longer step, which could increase their trip risk. During ascent, there were interaction effects detected between stair configurations and age groups. On the shorter step, foot contact lengths were increased for younger adults (≈+2.2%) and decreased for older adults (≈-2.8%) (interaction: F = 8.8, p=.004), this could increase the chances of a miss-step for the older adults. These differences seemed to stem from positioning on the walkway before transition. Younger adults were 8 mm closer to the stairs in their level-ground step, whereas older adults were 14 mm further away in the inconsistent going condition (interaction effect, p=.048). Descending balance parameters were affected by the presence of the inconsistent dimensions (Chapter 5). There were interactions between the CoM accelerations at 23.6%-31.9% and 73.4%-77.0% of stance on Step4 (p=.008 and p=.035, respectively) prior to contact with the inconsistent shorter going step, balance parameters after contact were minimally affected. Whereas for the inconsistent rise condition, balance was altered at contact with the higher step due to more posteriorly directed forces between 16.5%-22.2% of stance on Step3 (p=.020) and higher peak coefficients of friction (p=.003), this could increase the risk of slipping during loading. Despite increased loading rates (p<.001) and larger vertical CoM accelerations (p=.016) at initial contact onto Step2 (longer step down), there were compensations between 13.7%-19.5% of stance on Step2, whereby upward vertical CoM acceleration were increased to regain control before the subsequent step. Stepping behaviours observed on the inconsistent rise stairs indicate that younger and older adults did not detect the 10 mm difference in step rise, which put them at a higher risk of tripping in ascent and slipping in descent, and further required good reactive balance control to maintain CoM control after contact. The proactive changes to stepping behaviour and CoM control observed during descent of the inconsistent going stairs, seems to improve stepping mechanics so that minimal adjustments to CoM control are needed after contact. The proactive change is likely dependent on visual detection of the inconsistency. Frailer or distracted individuals may not be able to respond to the inconsistencies in the same way and therefore may have more frequent falls on inconsistent steps.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: biomechanics; stairs; ascent; descent; variable; dimensions; inconsistent; younger adults; older adults; stepping mechanics; balance control
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine
Divisions: Sport & Exercise Sciences
Date Deposited: 27 Oct 2020 10:09
Last Modified: 27 Oct 2020 10:10
DOI or Identification number: 10.24377/LJMU.t.00013907
Supervisors: O'Brien, T, Maganaris, C and Hollands, M
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/13907

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item