Tools
Tools
Koay, KL, Webster, M, Dixon, C, Gainer, P, Syrdal, D, Fisher, M and Dautenhahn, K (2021) Use and usability of software verification methods to detect behaviour interference when teaching an assistive home companion robot: A proof-of-concept study. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 12 (1). pp. 402-422. ISSN 2080-9778
|
Text
Use and usability of software verification methods to detect behaviour interference when teaching an assistive home companion robot A proof-of-concept study.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (5MB) | Preview |
Abstract
When studying the use of assistive robots in home environments, and especially how such robots can be personalised to meet the needs of the resident, key concerns are issues related to behaviour verification, behaviour interference and safety. Here, personalisation refers to the teaching of new robot behaviours by both technical and non-technical end users. In this article, we consider the issue of behaviour interference caused by situations where newly taught robot behaviours may affect or be affected by existing behaviours and thus, those behaviours will not or might not ever be executed. We focus in particular on how such situations can be detected and presented to the user. We describe the human–robot behaviour teaching system that we developed as well as the formal behaviour checking methods used. The online use of behaviour checking is demonstrated, based on static analysis of behaviours during the operation of the robot, and evaluated in a user study. We conducted a proof-of-concept human–robot interaction study with an autonomous, multi-purpose robot operating within a smart home environment. Twenty participants individually taught the robot behaviours according to instructions they were given, some of which caused interference with other behaviours. A mechanism for detecting behaviour interference provided feedback to participants and suggestions on how to resolve those conflicts. We assessed the participants’ views on detected interference as reported by the behaviour teaching system. Results indicate that interference warnings given to participants during teaching provoked an understanding of the issue. We did not find a significant influence of participants’ technical background. These results highlight a promising path towards verification and validation of assistive home companion robots that allow end-user personalisation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 0801 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing |
| Subjects: | Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA76 Computer software |
| Divisions: | Computer Science & Mathematics |
| Publisher: | De Gruyter |
| Date Deposited: | 05 Oct 2021 09:17 |
| Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2021 09:30 |
| DOI or ID number: | 10.1515/pjbr-2021-0028 |
| URI: | https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/15600 |
 |
View Item |