Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

“Why would we not want to keep everybody safe?” The views of family members of people who use drugs on the implementation of drug consumption rooms in Scotland

Parkes, T, Price, T, Foster, R, Trayner, K, Sumnall, H, Livingston, W, Perkins, A, Cairns, B, Dumbrell, J and Nicholls, J (2022) “Why would we not want to keep everybody safe?” The views of family members of people who use drugs on the implementation of drug consumption rooms in Scotland. Harm Reduction Journal, 19 (99). ISSN 1477-7517

Why would we not want to keep everybody safe.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview


Background: People who use drugs in Scotland are currently experiencing disproportionately high rates of drug-related deaths. Drug Consumption Rooms (DCRs) are harm reduction services that offer a safe, hygienic environment where pre-obtained drugs can be consumed under supervision. The aim of this research was to explore family member perspectives on DCR implementation in Scotland in order to inform national policy.
Methods: Scotland-based family members of people who were currently or formerly using drugs were invited to take part in semi-structured interviews to share views on DCRs. An inclusive approach to ‘family’ was taken and family members were recruited via local and national networks. A convenience sample of 13 family members were recruited and interviews conducted, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically using the Structured Framework Technique.
Results: Family members demonstrated varying levels of understanding regarding the existence, role and function of DCRs. While some expressed concern that DCRs would not prevent continued drug use, all participants were in favour of DCR implementation due to a belief that DCRs could reduce harm, including saving lives, and facilitate future recovery from drug use. Participants highlighted challenges faced by people who use drugs in accessing treatment/services that could meet their needs. They identified that accessible and welcoming DCRs led by trusting and non-judgemental staff could help to meet unmet needs, including signposting to other services. Family members viewed DCRs as safe environments and highlighted how the existence of DCRs could reduce the constant worry that they had of risk of harm to their loved ones. Finally, family members emphasised the challenge of stigma associated with drug use. They believed that introduction of DCRs would help to reduce stigma and provide a signal that people who use drugs deserve safety and care.
Conclusions: Reporting the experience and views of family members makes a novel and valuable contribution to ongoing public debates surrounding DCRs. Their views can be used to inform the implementation of DCRs in Scotland but also relate well to the development of wider responses to drug-related harm and reduction of stigma experienced by people who use drugs in Scotland and beyond

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Substance Abuse; 1117 Public Health and Health Services
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Divisions: Public Health Institute
Publisher: BioMed Central
SWORD Depositor: A Symplectic
Date Deposited: 15 Aug 2022 11:07
Last Modified: 20 Feb 2023 15:18
DOI or ID number: 10.1186/s12954-022-00679-5
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/17388
View Item View Item