Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

Construct Validity and Reproducibility of Handheld Ultrasound Devices n Carotid Artery Diameter Measurement.

Willems, L, Vermeulen, J, Wiegerinck, A, Fekkes, S, Reijnen, M, Warlé, M, De Korte, C and Thijssen, D (2022) Construct Validity and Reproducibility of Handheld Ultrasound Devices n Carotid Artery Diameter Measurement. Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 49 (3). ISSN 0301-5629

[img]
Preview
Text
PIIS0301562922006457 (1).pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

The construct validity and reproducibility of three commonly used handheld ultrasound (US) devices in measuring carotid arterial diameter was evaluated: Telemed MicrUs EXT-1H (Telemed, Vilnius, Lithuania), Butterfly iQ (Butterfly Network, Inc., Guilford, CT, USA) and Philips Lumify (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). An in vitro setup was built to evaluate construct validity, compared with high-end US, and intra-observer variability of handheld US devices. Handheld devices showed a mean difference of 0.023 ± 0.030 cm, 0.012 ± 0.037 cm and 0.009 ± 0.046 cm for, respectively, Telemed, Butterfly and Lumify in comparison with high-end US devices. Intraclass agreement with the high-end system as well as intra-observer variability for handheld US devices was classified as excellent, with all values greater than 0.95. Subsequently, inter-observer variability of handheld US devices was investigated in an in vivo setup with 20 healthy volunteers. Inter-observer variability was classified as excellent for Telemed (0.901), good for Lumify (0.827) and moderate for Butterfly (0.684) with a difference of, respectively, 0.005 ± 0.031 cm, 0.020 ± 0.050 cm and -0.003 ± 0.033 cm. In conclusion, handheld US devices demonstrated an excellent construct validity and intra-observer variability. Additionally, excellent-to-good inter-observer variability for Telemed and Lumify was observed, and Butterfly demonstrated a moderate inter-observer agreement. These results indicate that handheld US devices are effective for measuring carotid arterial diameter.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Carotid arteries; Diameter; Handheld ultrasound; Ultrasonography; 1103 Clinical Sciences; Acoustics
Subjects: Q Science > QP Physiology
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV561 Sports
Divisions: Sport & Exercise Sciences
Publisher: Elsevier BV
SWORD Depositor: A Symplectic
Date Deposited: 09 Jan 2023 12:26
Last Modified: 02 Nov 2023 12:10
DOI or ID number: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.11.013
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/18558
View Item View Item