Gomes, JP, Fernandes, D, De Medeiros Paulo, RM and Albuquerque, PB (2024) The effect of response modality on witness statements when using the self-administered interview. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. pp. 1-17. ISSN 1321-8719
|
Text
The effect of response modality on witness statements when using the self-administered interview.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The Self-Administered Interview (SAI©) elicits comprehensive initial statements from witnesses and can enhance subsequent statements. However, the SAI© requires a written response that may have disadvantages compared to a spoken account. This study tested the effect of SAI©’s response modality and its subsequent impact on a delayed retrieval attempt. After watching a mock crime, participants completed a Spoken-SAI©, Typed-SAI© or no-SAI©. Four days later, participants read a news report with misleading post-event information (PEI) and, after another three days, completed a free recall and a recognition test. The Spoken-SAI© required less time to be completed than the Typed-SAI© but elicited accounts with a comparable amount of correct information and accuracy. Providing an initial account using the SAI© (vs. no-SAI©) produced more detailed accounts one week later regardless of response modality but did not reduce the susceptibility to misleading PEI. This provides valuable insight for improving the SAI© and its applicability
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1701 Psychology; 1702 Cognitive Sciences; 1801 Law; Criminology |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology > HV7231 Criminal Justice Administrations |
Divisions: | Psychology (from Sep 2019) |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
SWORD Depositor: | A Symplectic |
Date Deposited: | 09 Feb 2024 13:58 |
Last Modified: | 09 Apr 2024 12:15 |
DOI or ID number: | 10.1080/13218719.2024.2313977 |
URI: | https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/22577 |
View Item |