Tools
Tools
Khan, RM (2023) The coloniality of the religious terrorism thesis. Review of International Studies. pp. 1-20. ISSN 0260-2105
|
Text
the-coloniality-of-the-religious-terrorism-thesis.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (290kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
The Coloniality of the Religious Terrorism Thesis Corrigendum.pdf - Supplemental Material Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (64kB) | Preview |
Abstract
A dominant narrative, produced and reproduced especially by terrorism scholars, holds that terrorism in its worst form is religious. The most dangerous and non-negotiable form of terrorism, in other words, is the religious kind. At the same time, there is a recurring implication, proposed by many terrorism scholars and reflected in public discourse, that terrorism, no matter its official designation, is always inherently ‘religious’ or ‘religious-like’. Both this implication and the dominant narrative about the uniquely dangerous character of ‘religious terrorism’ – which I summarise as the Religious Terrorism Thesis – builds on colonial knowledge and assumptions about ‘religion’. Religion is also, as I argue, written into the category ‘terrorism’ and enables its negative discursive power and the colonial imagination of ‘terrorism’ as racialised and a system-threat to (Western) modernity. Terrorism, therefore, can never constitute a neutral signifier of a specific kind of political violence. Instead, it functions as a negative ideograph to Western societies, which means it functions to uphold the project of Western modernity/coloniality. The Religious Terrorism Thesis, which I identify as the foundation for the dominant discourse on terrorism today, is a crucial element of coloniality and justifies many controversial and contemporary counterterrorism practices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | coloniality; modernity; race; religion; religious terrorism; terrorism; 1605 Policy and Administration; 1606 Political Science; 2203 Philosophy; International Relations |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BL Religion H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races |
| Divisions: | Humanities and Social Science |
| Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
| SWORD Depositor: | A Symplectic |
| Date Deposited: | 26 Feb 2024 11:30 |
| Last Modified: | 09 Dec 2024 15:30 |
| DOI or ID number: | 10.1017/S0260210523000517 |
| URI: | https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/22684 |
 |
View Item |