Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

Pulse Intensity Effects of Burst and Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation on Neural Responses to Brushing in Patients With Neuropathic Pain.

Hewitt, D, Byrne, A, Henderson, J, Wilford, K, Chawla, R, Sharma, ML, Frank, B, Fallon, N, Brown, C and Stancak, A (2022) Pulse Intensity Effects of Burst and Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation on Neural Responses to Brushing in Patients With Neuropathic Pain. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 26 (5). pp. 975-987. ISSN 1094-7159

PIIS1094715922013496.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (3MB) | Preview


Objectives: Tonic spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is accompanied by paresthesia in affected body regions. Comparatively, the absence of paresthesia with burst SCS suggests different involvement of the dorsal column system conveying afferent impulses from lowthreshold mechanoreceptors. This study evaluated cortical activation changes during gentle brushing of a pain-free leg during four SCS pulse intensities to assess the effect of intensity on recruitment of dorsal column system fibers during burst and tonic SCS. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients using SCS (11 burst, nine tonic) for neuropathic leg pain participated. Brushing was administered to a pain-free area of the leg during four SCS intensities:therapeutic (100%),medium(66%),low(33%),andnostimulation. Whole-brain electroencephalography was continuously recorded. Changes in spectral power during brushing were evaluated using the event-related desynchronization (ERD) method in theta (4–7Hz),alpha(8–13 Hz), and beta (16–24 Hz) frequency bands. Results: Brushing was accompanied by a suppression of cortical oscillations in the range 4–24 Hz. Stronger intensities of burst and tonic SCS led to less suppression of 4–7 Hz and 8–13 Hz bands in parietal electrodes, and in central electrodes in the 16–24 Hz band, with the strongest, statistically significant suppression at medium intensity. Tonic SCS showed a stronger reduction in 4–7 Hz oscillations over right sensorimotor electrodes, and over right frontal and left sensorimotor electrodes in the 8–13 Hz band, compared to burst SCS. Conclusions: Results suggest that burst and tonic SCS are mediated by both different and shared mechanisms. Attenuated brushing-related ERD with tonic SCS suggests a gating of cortical activation by afferent impulses in the dorsal column, whereas burst may engage different pathways. Diminished brushing-related ERD at medium and therapeutic intensities of burst and tonic SCS points towards a nonlinear effect of SCS on somatosensory processing.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Brain; Spinal Cord; Humans; Neuralgia; Paresthesia; Electrodes; Spinal Cord Stimulation; Electroencephalography; humans; neuropathic pain; spinal cord stimulation; time-frequency; Humans; Spinal Cord Stimulation; Paresthesia; Neuralgia; Electrodes; Brain; Spinal Cord; 1103 Clinical Sciences; 1109 Neurosciences; 1702 Cognitive Sciences; Neurology & Neurosurgery
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Psychology (from Sep 2019)
Publisher: Elsevier
SWORD Depositor: A Symplectic
Date Deposited: 14 Mar 2024 16:28
Last Modified: 14 Mar 2024 16:30
DOI or ID number: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.11.001
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/22808
View Item View Item