Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

The top tier of the Big Five does not predict police decisions in ambiguous and high-pressure situations

Tajeiro, R, Mcllroy, D, Palace, M, Paulo, RM and González Álvarez, JL (2024) The top tier of the Big Five does not predict police decisions in ambiguous and high-pressure situations. Cogent Social Sciences, 10 (1).

[img]
Preview
Text
The top tier of the Big Five does not predict police decisions in ambiguous and high-pressure situations.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Whilst the link between personality and decision-making has been studied across various domains, the predictive capability of the Big Five model (openness to experience, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism; Costa & McCrae, 2012) for police decisions in high-risk ambiguous situations under time pressure remains unexplored. One-hundred and fifty-six cadets in a Spanish police force’s commanders’ school (78.8% male, aged 21 to 54) responded to two expert-designed policing scenarios necessitating quick decisions in ambiguous and high-risk conditions, where they had to act or wait for more information through different stages. They then completed the Mini-IPIP (Donnellan et al., 2006). Statistical tests revealed no significant relationships between the Big Five and (a) participants' decision timing or (b) the appropriateness of their decisions (all p > .05). Linear regressions found no mediation by participants' gender or prior experience. The predictive power of the top tier of the Big Five in these scenarios is not supported; consideration is given to analysing at the facet or subdimension level.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Psychology (from Sep 2019)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Group
SWORD Depositor: A Symplectic
Date Deposited: 23 May 2024 11:46
Last Modified: 20 Jun 2024 12:15
DOI or ID number: 10.1080/23311886.2024.2359636
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/23354
View Item View Item