Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

Diagnosing dehydration? Blend evidence with clinical observations

Armstrong, LE, Kavouras, SA, Walsh, NP and Roberts, WO (2016) Diagnosing dehydration? Blend evidence with clinical observations. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 19 (6). pp. 434-438. ISSN 1363-1950

[img]
Preview
Text
Diagnosing dehydration Blend evidence with clinical observations.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (711kB) | Preview

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of the review is to provide recommendations to improve clinical decision-making based on the strengths and weaknesses of commonly used hydration biomarkers and clinical assessment methods. RECENT FINDINGS: There is widespread consensus regarding treatment, but not the diagnosis of dehydration. Even though it is generally accepted that a proper clinical diagnosis of dehydration can only be made biochemically rather than relying upon clinical signs and symptoms, no gold standard biochemical hydration index exists. Other than clinical biomarkers in blood (i.e., osmolality and blood urea nitrogen/creatinine) and in urine (i.e., osmolality and specific gravity), blood pressure assessment and clinical symptoms in the eye (i.e., tear production and palpitating pressure) and the mouth (i.e., thirst and mucous wetness) can provide important information for diagnosing dehydration. SUMMARY: We conclude that clinical observations based on a combination of history, physical examination, laboratory values, and clinician experience remain the best approach to the diagnosis of dehydration.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care. The published version of record Armstrong, Lawrence E.; Kavouras, Stavros A.; Walsh, Neil P.; Roberts, William O.. Diagnosing dehydration? Blend evidence with clinical observations. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care 19(6):p 434-438, November 2016. | DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000320 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1097/mco.0000000000000320
Uncontrolled Keywords: Algorithms Biomarkers/blood/urine Blood Pressure Blood Urea Nitrogen Clinical Decision-Making/methods Creatinine/blood Dehydration/*diagnosis/physiopathology Humans Mucous Membrane Osmolar Concentration Specific Gravity Urine; Mucous Membrane; Urine; Humans; Dehydration; Creatinine; Blood Urea Nitrogen; Blood Pressure; Osmolar Concentration; Specific Gravity; Algorithms; Biomarkers; Clinical Decision-Making; Algorithms; Biomarkers; Blood Pressure; Blood Urea Nitrogen; Clinical Decision-Making; Creatinine; Dehydration; Humans; Mucous Membrane; Osmolar Concentration; Specific Gravity; Urine; 4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies; Algorithms; Biomarkers; Blood Pressure; Blood Urea Nitrogen; Clinical Decision-Making; Creatinine; Dehydration; Humans; Mucous Membrane; Osmolar Concentration; Specific Gravity; Urine; 11 Medical and Health Sciences; Nutrition & Dietetics
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine
Divisions: Sport and Exercise Sciences
Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
SWORD Depositor: A Symplectic
Date Deposited: 14 Jan 2025 10:53
Last Modified: 14 Jan 2025 11:00
DOI or ID number: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000320
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/25261
View Item View Item