Tools
Tools
Sherman, J, Voigt, M, Ancrenaz, M, Meijaard, E, Oram, F, Williamson, EA, Russon, AE, Seaman, DJI, Caurant, C, Byler, D and Wich, SA (2025) Outcomes of orangutan wild-to-wild translocations reveal conservation and welfare risks. PLoS One, 20 (3). ISSN 1932-6203
|
Text
Outcomes of orangutan wild to wild translocations reveal conservation and welfare risks.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Wild orangutans (Pongo spp.) are captured and moved (wild-to-wild translocated) primarily to prevent crop foraging or out of concern for orangutans' survival in fragmented habitat. Little is known about wild-to-wild translocation frequency, circumstances, and possible species conservation and individual welfare outcomes. We investigated orangutan wild-to-wild translocations in Indonesia from 2005 to 2022 using primarily data from public sources and consultation with practitioners. At least 988 wild orangutans were captured for translocation during the study period, including many reproductively valuable resident females and adult males removed from unprotected fragmented forests and forest patches. Data on health condition (n = 808) indicated 81.7% were reported as healthy at time of capture. Information on post-capture disposition (n = 268) showed that only 23% were translocated immediately. Mean estimated killing combined with reported translocation removals was calculated to affect 3.3% of orangutans in Kalimantan, and 11.6% in Sumatra, both higher than the threshold of mortality from human actions expected to drive populations to extinction. Negative impacts are likely compounded where multiple individuals are translocated from the same area, and for the Tapanuli orangutan (P. tapanuliensis), which has the smallest population and range of all orangutan species. Data on reasons for capture (n = 743) indicated most translocations (69%) were conducted to address crop foraging and orangutan presence in or around croplands and plantations. Forest cover analysis around 104 orangutan capture sites with high resolution spatial information indicated that deforestation levels in the year preceding capture were not significantly associated with likelihood of captures for translocation. To improve conservation outcomes, wild-to-wild translocations should be used only in exceptional circumstances. Most orangutans should instead be monitored and protected in situ by addressing conflicts and maintaining the forests, including forest fragments, they are using. When translocation is necessary, post-release survival and potential conservation impacts must be monitored.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Animals; Conservation of Natural Resources; Female; Indonesia; Male; Pongo; Ecosystem; Animals, Wild; Forests; Endangered Species; General Science & Technology |
| Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology |
| Divisions: | Biological and Environmental Sciences (from Sep 19) |
| Publisher: | Public Library of Science |
| SWORD Depositor: | A Symplectic |
| Date Deposited: | 24 Mar 2025 13:53 |
| Last Modified: | 24 Mar 2025 14:00 |
| DOI or ID number: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0317862 |
| URI: | https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/25974 |
 |
View Item |