Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

High impact  =  high statistical standards? Not necessarily so.

Tressoldi, PE, Giofré, D, Sella, F and Cumming, G (2013) High impact  =  high statistical standards? Not necessarily so. PLoS One, 8 (2). ISSN 1932-6203

[img]
Preview
Text
High impact  =  high statistical standards? Not necessarily so.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (302kB) | Preview

Abstract

What are the statistical practices of articles published in journals with a high impact factor? Are there differences compared with articles published in journals with a somewhat lower impact factor that have adopted editorial policies to reduce the impact of limitations of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing? To investigate these questions, the current study analyzed all articles related to psychological, neuropsychological and medical issues, published in 2011 in four journals with high impact factors: Science, Nature, The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet, and three journals with relatively lower impact factors: Neuropsychology, Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied and the American Journal of Public Health. Results show that Null Hypothesis Significance Testing without any use of confidence intervals, effect size, prospective power and model estimation, is the prevalent statistical practice used in articles published in Nature, 89%, followed by articles published in Science, 42%. By contrast, in all other journals, both with high and lower impact factors, most articles report confidence intervals and/or effect size measures. We interpreted these differences as consequences of the editorial policies adopted by the journal editors, which are probably the most effective means to improve the statistical practices in journals with high or low impact factors.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: MD Multidisciplinary
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > ZA Information resources
Divisions: Natural Sciences & Psychology (closed 31 Aug 19)
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Related URLs:
Date Deposited: 15 Jan 2016 09:19
Last Modified: 04 Sep 2021 13:39
DOI or ID number: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056180
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/2619
View Item View Item