Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

Experience and networked learning

Jones, CR (2016) Experience and networked learning. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Networked Learning 2016 . pp. 481-488. (Networked Learning Conference, 09 May 2016 - 11 May 2016, Lancaster).

[img]
Preview
Text
Experience and networked learning-Jones.pdf - Published Version

Download (162kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper reviews the way experience has been understood and the research agendas associated with that understanding in networked learning. In the contemporary context the student 'experience' is part of common speech and often associated with a consumerist discourse, especially in the UK and US. The widespread use of digital and networked technologies in education has also given rise to a de-centring of the subject and an identification of actors in network settings as hybrids of humans and machines (including software and code in this category) or including machines and objects as actors within a network. With a decentred subject does it still make sense to understand learning in terms of the subject's personal experience anymore? This paper explores these debates in the context of current educational discourse and in relation to prior research and theory in networked learning. Experience has a long history associated with phenomenological research and the related but distinct approach of phenomenography. It is related to central issues for education and learning, in particular the place of the 'individual' cognising subject. Experience can be thought of as either the essential distinguishing component of the individual human subject, or experience can be understood as the subjective component of one kind of element in a wider assemblage of humans and machines. In the later understanding of experience in assemblages human experience does not separate the human actor from other actors in a network and they are understood symmetrically. It is a long standing position that the human sciences have a different relationship to their objects of study than natural sciences because the human sciences can have access to interior accounts from the 'objects' they observe and because human subjects can behave in ways that are not predicable, replicable, and which depend on an active construction of experience in the world. For networked learning the position and role of the human subject is a central concern and human-human interaction has always been considered essential. This paper reasserts the need for a proper understanding of experience and explores the place of the human subject in the developing research agendas found in networked learning.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Experience; student; subject; post-human; sociomaterial; phenomenology; phenomenography
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
Divisions: Education
Date Deposited: 02 Feb 2016 11:22
Last Modified: 13 Apr 2022 15:14
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/2806
View Item View Item