Taylor, S, Buchanan, J and Ayres, TC (2016) Prohibition, Privilege and the Drug Apartheid: The failure of drug policy reform to address the underlying fallacies of drug prohibition. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 16 (4). pp. 452-469. ISSN 1748-8966

Preview

Text Taylor, Buchanan and Ayres CCJ submission[1].pdf - Accepted Version Download (624kB) | Preview

Abstract

It appears to be a time of turbulence within the global drug policy landscape. The historically dominant model of drug prohibition endures, yet a number of alternative models of legalisation, decriminalisation and regulation are emerging across the world. Whilst critics have asserted that prohibition and the ensuing ‘war on drugs’ lack both an evidence base and legitimacy, reformers are embracing these alternatives as indicators of progressive change. This paper, however, argues that such reforms adhere to the same arbitrary notions, moral dogma and fallacious evidence base as their predecessor. As such they represent the ‘metamorphosis of prohibition’, whereby the structure of drug policy changes, yet the underpinning principles remain unchanged. Consequentially, these reforms should not be considered ‘progressive’ as they risk further consolidating the underlying inconsistencies and contradictions that have formed the basis of drug prohibition.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	1602 Criminology
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
Divisions:	Law
Publisher:	SAGE Publications (UK and US)
Date Deposited:	09 Mar 2016 12:09
Last Modified:	04 Sep 2021 13:16
DOI or ID number:	10.1177/1748895816633274.
URI:	https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/3118

View Item