Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

The Effect of Statins on Cardiovascular Outcomes by Smoking Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Ursoniu, S, Mikhailidis, D, Serban, M, Penson, P, Toth, P, Ridker, P, Ray, K, Hovingh, G, Kastelein, J, Hernandez, A, Manson, J, Rysz, J and Banach, M (2017) The Effect of Statins on Cardiovascular Outcomes by Smoking Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pharmacological Research, 122. pp. 105-177. ISSN 1096-1186

Statins and smoking_accepted.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (474kB) | Preview


Smoking is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. The impact of statin therapy on CVD risk by smoking status has not been fully investigated. Therefore we assessed the impact of statin therapy on CVD outcomes by smoking status through a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The literature search included EMBASE, ProQuest, CINAHL and PUBMED databases to 30 January 2016 to identify RCTs that investigated the effect of statin therapy on cumulative incidence of major CVD endpoints (e.g. non-fatal myocardial infarction, revascularization, unstable angina, and stroke). Relative risks (RR) ratios were calculated from the number of events in different treatment groups for both smokers and non-smokers. Finally 11 trials with 89,604 individuals were included. The number of smokers and non-smokers in the statin groups of the analyzed studies was 8826 and 36,090, respectively. The RR for major CV events was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.81; p<0.001) in nonsmokers and 0.72 (95%CI: 0.64-0.81; p<0.001) in smokers. Moderate to high heterogeneity was observed both in non-smokers (I2=77.1%, p<0.001) and in smokers (I2=51.6%, p=0.024) groups. Smokers seemed to benefit slightly more from statins than non-smokers according to the number needed to treat (NNT) analysis (23.5 vs 26.8) based on RRs applied to the control event rates. The number of avoided events per 1000 individuals was 42.5 (95%CI: 28.9-54.6) in smokers and 37.3 (95%CI: 27.2-46.4) in non-smokers. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the effect of statins on CVD is similar for smokers and non-smokers, but in terms of NNTs and number of avoided events, smokers seem to benefit more although non-significantly.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 1115 Pharmacology And Pharmaceutical Sciences
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
R Medicine > RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology
Divisions: Pharmacy & Biomolecular Sciences
Publisher: Elsevier
Date Deposited: 07 Jun 2017 08:50
Last Modified: 04 Sep 2021 11:27
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/6650
View Item View Item