Tools
Tools
Drew, K, Morris, R, Tod, D and Eubank, MR (2019) A meta-study of qualitative research on the junior-to-senior transition in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. ISSN 1469-0292
|
Text
A meta-study of qualitative research on the junior-to-senior transition in sport.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The last decade has seen an increase in empirical research associated with the junior-to-senior transition in sport. Previous research has, however, been idiosyncratic in its nature, focused on understanding the process from domain specific perspective. The purpose of the current study, therefore, was to provide a systematic review of literature focused on the junior-to-senior transition. Specifically, this study: (a) provides an overview and critique of methodological and theoretical decisions which underpin current junior-to-senior transition literature; (b) systematically reviews, evaluates, and analyses literature on the junior-to-senior transition in sport regarding key factors that are perceived to impact the transition; and (c) provides a synthesis of findings regarding the factors that influence the junior-to-senior transition in sport. A total of 27 studies were included in this meta-study. Meta-method, meta-theory, meta-data analysis, and meta-synthesis analyses were conducted on data. Data highlighted that the main method used to research the junior-to-senior transition is cross-sectional individual interviews, with two theories (Stambulova, 2003; Wylleman & Lavallee, 2004) used as the main underpinning theories for data collection. Analysis identified 61 factors that were perceived to impact the junior-to-senior transition. These 61 factors fell into one of 13 themes, which were then categorized into 4 overarching themes: individual factors, external factors, cultural factors, and intervention strategies. A model of junior-to-senior transition, which synthesizes current knowledge, is proposed as a way to explain the process. The current study identifies gaps in current knowledge, highlights practical implications, and identifies future research directions (e.g., longitudinal designs).
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 13 Education, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV561 Sports |
| Divisions: | Sport & Exercise Sciences |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| Date Deposited: | 25 Jun 2019 11:09 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Sep 2021 09:15 |
| DOI or ID number: | 10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101556 |
| URI: | https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/10928 |
 |
View Item |