Humphrey, N, Panayiotou, M, Hennessey, A and Ashworth, E (2021) Treatment effect modifiers in a randomized trial of the good behavior game during middle childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 89 (8). pp. 668-681. ISSN 0022-006X

Preview

Text CCP-2020-2379_R2.pdf - Accepted Version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective: Two key treatment effect modifiers—implementation variability and participant cumulative risk status—are examined as predictors of disruptive behavior outcomes in the context of a large cluster randomized controlled trial of a universal, school-based behavior management intervention. The core components of the Good Behavior Game (GBG) are classroom rules, team membership, monitoring behavior, and positive reinforcement. Children work in teams to win the game, which is played alongside a normal classroom activity, during which their teacher monitors infractions to classroom rules. Teams with four or fewer infractions at the end of the game win and are rewarded.
Method: Seventy-seven English primary schools (N = 3,084 children, aged 6–7) were randomly assigned to deliver the GBG or continue their usual practice over 2 years.
Results: Intent-to-treat analysis found no discernible impact of the intervention on children’s disruptive behavior. Additionally, subgroup analyses revealed no differential gains among children at low, moderate or high levels of cumulative risk exposure (CRE). However, complier average causal effect estimation (CACE) using dosage as a compliance marker identified a large, statistically significant intervention effect (d = −1.35) among compliers (>1,030 min of cumulative intervention exposure). Furthermore, this compliance effect varied by participant CRE, such that children at high and low levels of exposure experienced significantly greater and lesser reductions in disruptive behavior, respectively.
Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of optimizing implementation and demonstrate the utility of CRE as a theoretically informed approach to subgroup moderator analysis. Implications are discussed and study strengths and limitations are noted.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	©American Psychological Association, 2021. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000673
Uncontrolled Keywords:	1701 Psychology
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Psychology (from Sep 2019)
Publisher:	American Psychological Association (APA)
Date Deposited:	06 Sep 2021 09:46
Last Modified:	06 Sep 2021 09:46
DOI or ID number:	10.1037/ccp0000673
URI:	https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/15446

View Item