Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

Syntactic Representations Are Both Abstract and Semantically Constrained: Evidence From Children’s and Adults’ Comprehension and Production/Priming of the English Passive

Bidgood, A, Pine, JM, Rowland, CF and Ambridge, B (2020) Syntactic Representations Are Both Abstract and Semantically Constrained: Evidence From Children’s and Adults’ Comprehension and Production/Priming of the English Passive. Cognitive Science, 44 (9). e12892. ISSN 0364-0213

[img]
Preview
Text
BidgoodEtAl(2020)Passives.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (785kB) | Preview
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12892 (Published version)

Abstract

All accounts of language acquisition agree that, by around age 4, children’s knowledge of grammatical constructions is abstract, rather than tied solely to individual lexical items. The aim of the present research was to investigate, focusing on the passive, whether children’s and adults’ performance is additionally semantically constrained, varying according to the distance between the semantics of the verb and those of the construction. In a forced-choice pointing study (Experiment 1), both 4- to 6-year olds (N = 60) and adults (N = 60) showed support for the prediction of this semantic construction prototype account of an interaction such that the observed disadvantage for passives as compared to actives (i.e., fewer correct points/longer reaction time) was greater for experiencer-theme verbs than for agent-patient and theme-experiencer verbs (e.g., Bob was seen/hit/frightened by Wendy). Similarly, in a production/priming study (Experiment 2), both 4- to 6-year olds (N = 60) and adults (N = 60) produced fewer passives for experiencer-theme verbs than for agent-patient/theme-experiencer verbs. We conclude that these findings are difficult to explain under accounts based on the notion of A(rgument) movement or of a monostratal, semantics-free, level of syntax, and instead necessitate some form of semantic construction prototype account.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Humans; Language Development; Comprehension; Reaction Time; Semantics; Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Autonomy of syntax; Comprehension; Exemplar model; Passive construction; Prototype model; Semantic prototype construction; Shallow syntax; Syntactic priming; Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Comprehension; Humans; Language Development; Reaction Time; Semantics; Experimental Psychology; 0801 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing; 1701 Psychology; 1702 Cognitive Sciences
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Divisions: Psychology (from Sep 2019)
Publisher: Wiley
SWORD Depositor: A Symplectic
Date Deposited: 04 Aug 2022 10:41
Last Modified: 04 Aug 2022 10:45
DOI or ID number: 10.1111/cogs.12892
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/17337
View Item View Item