Richter, M (2015) Comment: Where is the theory? A critical comment on multiple arousal theory. Emotion Review. ISSN 1754-0747
This is the latest version of this item.
|
Text
Richter_2015_EmotionReview_GreenOpenAccess.pdf - Accepted Version Download (42kB) | Preview |
Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1754073915572146
Abstract
Multiple arousal theory suggests that there is more than one arousal system and that the activity of the multiple arousal systems can be observed using electrodermal measures at various body sites. The ideas expressed by multiple arousal theory are interesting but they do not constitute a theory. The absence of a specific definition of arousal and the lack of testable predictions prevent multiple arousal theory from constituting a useful theoretical framework for focussed empirical research
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: | Natural Sciences and Psychology (closed 31 Aug 19) |
Publisher: | Sage |
Date Deposited: | 02 Nov 2015 08:09 |
Last Modified: | 04 Sep 2021 14:04 |
DOI or ID number: | 10.1177/1754073915572146 |
URI: | https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/1842 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Comment: Where is the theory? A critical comment on multiple arousal theory. (deposited 09 Jul 2015 11:20)
- Comment: Where is the theory? A critical comment on multiple arousal theory. (deposited 02 Nov 2015 08:09) [Currently Displayed]
View Item |