Tools
Tools
Walker, S, Spillane, E, Stringer, K, Meadowcroft, A, Dasgupta, T, Davies, SM, Sandall, J, Shennan, A, Batish, A, Davidson, L, Das, S, Magurova, L, Haroun, G, Meates, C, Houghton, G and Grys, HL (2023) The feasibility of team care for women seeking to plan a vaginal breech birth (OptiBreech 1): an observational implementation feasibility study in preparation for a pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9 (1). ISSN 2055-5784
|
Text
The feasibility of team care for women seeking to plan a vaginal breech birth (OptiBreech 1) an observational implementation.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: OptiBreech Care is a care pathway for breech presentation at term, including where chosen, physiological breech birth attended by professionals with advanced training and/or proficiency. We aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing OptiBreech team care prior to proceeding with a planned pilot randomised controlled trial. Methods: Our design was an observational implementation feasibility assessment across England and Wales, January 2021–June 2022. Our objectives were to determine whether Trusts could provide attendants with advanced training (implementation feasibility), who deliver protocol-consistent care (fidelity), within existing resources (costs), while maintaining low neonatal admission rates (safety) and adequate recruitment rates (trial feasibility). Participants included women > 37 weeks pregnant with a breech-presenting foetus, requesting support for a vaginal breech birth following standard counselling, and staff involved in the study. No randomisation occurred in this first stage of feasibility work. Results: Thirteen National Health Service sites were recruited. A total of 82 women planned births in the study. Sites with a breech specialist midwife recruited at double the rate of sites without (0.90/month, 95% CI 0.64–1.16 vs 0.40, 95% CI 0.12–0.68). Referrals into the study came from midwives (46%), obstetricians (34%) and women themselves (20%). Vaginal births were attended by staff with OptiBreech training at 87.5% (35/40, 95% CI 0.732–0.958) and by staff who met additional proficiency criteria at 67.5% (27/40, 95% CI 0.509–0.814). Fidelity criteria were more consistently met by staff who also met proficiency criteria. There were four neonatal admissions (4.9%, 4/82), including one serious adverse outcome (1.2%, 1/82). Conclusions: A prospective observational cohort of OptiBreech collaborative care, which could potentially support nested or cluster randomisation, appears feasible in sites willing to establish a dedicated clinic and strategically develop further proficient members of staff, with back-up plans for supporting rapidly progressing births. Randomisation procedures remain to be feasibility tested. It is funded by the NIHR (NIHR300582).
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | OptiBreech Collaborative; Breech presentation; Feasibility; Implementation; Intrapartum care |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics |
| Divisions: | Psychology (from Sep 2019) |
| Publisher: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
| SWORD Depositor: | A Symplectic |
| Date Deposited: | 19 Jul 2023 13:33 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Jul 2023 13:45 |
| DOI or ID number: | 10.1186/s40814-023-01299-x |
| URI: | https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/20437 |
 |
View Item |