Krahé, C, Fotopoulou, A, Hammond, C, Banissy, MJ, Koukoutsakis, A and Jenkinson, PM (2024) The meaning of touch: Relational and individual variables shape emotions and intentions associated with imagined social touch. European Journal of Social Psychology. ISSN 0046-2772
|
Text
The meaning of touch Relational and individual variables shape emotions and intentions associated with imagine social touch.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Touch is a key channel for conveying meaning in social interactions. The affective quality of touch and its effects on well-being are shaped by relational context (relationship between touch giver vs. recipient) and person variables (e.g. adult attachment style). Yet, such effects have not been explored in relation to the meaning ascribed to touch. We used data from the Touch Test, the world's largest touch survey, which included questions on the degree to which people felt and related specific emotions and intentions to imagined gentle stroking touch and hugs. In N = 23,428, we examined how relational context (imagined source of touch) and person variables (gender, recalled positive childhood touch and adult attachment style) were associated with positive (e.g. love, desire, support) and negative (e.g. fear, anger, warning) emotions and intentions related to imagined touch. Love, desire and support were endorsed more when participants had had their partner (vs. someone else) in mind, and women (vs. men) gave lower ratings for desire overall. Gentle stroking touch was most linked with arousal when participants had had their partner in mind. Further, more positive childhood touch and secure and anxious attachment scores were associated with more positive emotions and intentions, while the opposite was found for avoidant attachment scores. Lastly, positive childhood touch and higher anxious attachment scores were related to greater discrimination between distinct emotion and intention categories, while higher attachment avoidance was associated with reduced discriminability. Thus, contextual and person variables matter in shaping the meaning of social touch.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1608 Sociology; 1701 Psychology; 1702 Cognitive Sciences; Social Psychology |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: | Psychology (from Sep 2019) |
Publisher: | Wiley |
SWORD Depositor: | A Symplectic |
Date Deposited: | 06 Jun 2024 09:23 |
Last Modified: | 06 Jun 2024 09:30 |
DOI or ID number: | 10.1002/ejsp.3076 |
URI: | https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/23437 |
View Item |