Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

Grazing impacts on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) abundance and diversity on semi-natural grassland

Pozsgai, G, Quinzo-Ortega, L and Littlewood, NA (2021) Grazing impacts on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) abundance and diversity on semi-natural grassland. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 15 (1). pp. 36-47. ISSN 1752-458X

[img]
Preview
Text
Grazing impacts on ground beetle (Coleoptera Carabidae) abundance and diversity on semi-natural grassland.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (919kB) | Preview

Abstract

Semi‐natural grasslands are commonly managed as a grazing resource for domestic livestock but, due to their unique biodiversity, they are also of conservation interest. Numerous drivers have impacted on the status of these grasslands in recent decades, most importantly changing grazing management strategies. These changes have the potential to affect the biodiversity associated with these habitats, including on some rich invertebrate assemblages. Responses, however, are often dissimilar between different invertebrate taxa. We investigated the responses of ground beetles to different grazing regimes within a replicated, controlled, long‐term grazing experiment on upland semi‐natural grassland in Scotland. Although there was substantial overlap of species composition of ground beetle assemblages in different grazing treatments, species richness, abundance and Shannon diversity of ground beetles were significantly lower in ungrazed plots than in plots subject to high‐ or low‐intensity sheep grazing. Ground beetle abundance (but not species richness or diversity) was lower in ungrazed plots compared to those with low‐intensity mixed grazing by sheep and cattle. However, no differences were identified in abundance, species richness or diversity between the three grazed treatments. Our results suggest that ground beetles may show different responses to grazing compared to responses of some other invertebrate groups and demonstrate the difficulty of attempting to manage grazing to optimise conditions for a wide range of invertebrates.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ASSEMBLAGES; Biodiversity & Conservation; Biodiversity Conservation; Carabid assemblages; CLASSIFICATION; COMMUNITIES; CONSERVATION; Entomology; grazing pressure; HABITATS; INSECT DIVERSITY; LANDSCAPE; Life Sciences & Biomedicine; livestock; MANAGEMENT; PITFALL TRAPS; Science & Technology; sustainable habitat management; upland grassland; UPLAND GRASSLANDS; Science & Technology; Life Sciences & Biomedicine; Biodiversity Conservation; Entomology; Biodiversity & Conservation; Carabid assemblages; grazing pressure; livestock; sustainable habitat management; upland grassland; UPLAND GRASSLANDS; INSECT DIVERSITY; PITFALL TRAPS; ASSEMBLAGES; MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITIES; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVATION; LANDSCAPE; HABITATS; 0502 Environmental Science and Management; 0602 Ecology; 0608 Zoology
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Divisions: Biological and Environmental Sciences (from Sep 19)
Publisher: Wiley
SWORD Depositor: A Symplectic
Date Deposited: 29 Oct 2024 12:52
Last Modified: 29 Oct 2024 13:00
DOI or ID number: 10.1111/icad.12533
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/24613
View Item View Item