Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

Associations between the logical memory test story recall metrics and plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease in individuals free of dementia

Jauregi Zinkunegi, A and Bruno, D Associations between the logical memory test story recall metrics and plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease in individuals free of dementia. Clinical Neuropsychologist. ISSN 1385-4046 (Accepted)

[img] Text
Manuscript final.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (384kB)
[img] Text
Supplementary Materials final.pdf - Supplemental Material
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Objective: Blood-based biomarkers are valued for their lower cost and less invasive nature, though issues with widespread implementation and accessibility remain. Process-based scores from story recall have been shown to detect neuronal network disturbances typical of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology more effectively than traditional metrics. This study examined the associations between process-based scores and concurrent plasma AD biomarkers in older adults without dementia, while also comparing them to traditional metrics. Additionally, it also investigated the diagnostic utility of these metrics in detecting plasma p-tau217 positivity. Methods: Data from 416 participants (mean age = 66.6±7) free of dementia were extracted from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer’s Prevention (WRAP). Logical Memory Test (LMT) and plasma p-tau217, p-tau181, p-tau231, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, GFAP and NfL levels were analysed. Bayesian regression models assessed associations between plasma biomarkers and both process-based and traditional LMT scores, controlling for the covariates. Results: The best-fitting model for plasma p-tau217 included Total ratio (Tr) and Immediate recall (BF10=573), but Tr showed stronger evidence of association (mean coefficient=0.208; BFinclusion=14.4) than Immediate recall (mean coefficient=-0.007; BFinclusion=1.7). Tr was also the best predictor of plasma p-tau181 (mean coefficient=0.144; BF10=10.5) and GFAP (mean coefficient=0.141; BF10=5.8), outperforming traditional LMT scores. No memory scores were associated with plasma p-tau231 or Ab42/40 ratio levels. Tr score was the strongest single predictor of p-tau217 positivity (BF10=38). Conclusions: These findings suggest that process-based memory scores might be useful in enhancing the detection of neuronal network disturbances associated with AD pathology, especially in settings where biomarker testing is unavailable.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 1109 Neurosciences; 1701 Psychology; 1702 Cognitive Sciences; Clinical Psychology; 5201 Applied and developmental psychology; 5202 Biological psychology; 5203 Clinical and health psychology
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Psychology (from Sep 2019)
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
SWORD Depositor: A Symplectic
Date Deposited: 14 Mar 2025 12:13
Last Modified: 14 Mar 2025 12:13
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/25897
View Item View Item