Tools
Tools
Wobi, F, Brett, CE, Harrison, R, Kidd, TM and Timpson, H (2025) Social Prescribing Data and Outcome Recording Practices: An Interview‐Based Study Into the Opinions and Experiences of Social Prescribing Stakeholders in the Liverpool City Region, UK. Health & Social Care in the Community (1). ISSN 0966-0410
|
Text
Social Prescribing Data and Outcome Recording Practices An Interview Based Study.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (419kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: Social prescribing (SP) is a system-wide approach to reducing health inequalities through nonclinical healthcare interventions. The aim of this study was to explore the practices undertaken and the opinions held by various stakeholders involved in SP in relation to data collection and information utilisation within and between SP programmes/schemes. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with nine stakeholders involved in SP planning and delivery within the Liverpool City Region (LCR), including SP link workers, service managers and commissioners. A deductive thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the transcripts. Results: Three themes were identified pertaining to quantitative data recording, qualitative data recording and the utilisation of data. The interviews revealed considerable variations in systems and consistency of data collection among stakeholders. While some data were collected via existing outcome measurement tools, their adequacy for use within SP in particular was critiqued. Case studies and qualitative feedback (formal and informal) were more frequently used and were felt to be more effective in capturing impact. Strengths of data sharing included the creation of data intelligence to inform more targeted service provision. Knowledge of national guidance pertaining to SP data collection and outcome recording was lacking. Conclusion: Further research on the acceptability of incorporating further SP-specific indicators within commissioner reporting systems is needed, including formal acknowledgement of qualitative impact reporting on existing, quantitative health inequality indicators or key performance indicators. However, the burden of this on existing structures needs to be assessed. Support for data linkage arrangements and data recording processes, combined with wider routine outcome data recording, can support a targeted approach to increasing the evidence base for SP’s impact on health and wellbeing.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1117 Public Health and Health Services; 1607 Social Work; Nursing; 4203 Health services and systems; 4206 Public health; 4409 Social work |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine |
| Divisions: | Psychology (from Sep 2019) Public and Allied Health Nursing and Advanced Practice |
| Publisher: | Wiley |
| SWORD Depositor: | A Symplectic |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Apr 2025 15:23 |
| Last Modified: | 01 Apr 2025 15:30 |
| DOI or ID number: | 10.1155/hsc/8094184 |
| Editors: | Tierney, S |
| URI: | https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/26061 |
 |
View Item |