Dowell, R ORCID: 0000-0002-1518-3909, Craggs, J, Head, C, Yesson, C and Ransome, E
(2025)
DNA State Influences the Uptake and Persistence of Environmental DNA by Marine Sponge Natural Samplers.
Ecology and Evolution, 15 (5).
Preview |
Text
Ecology and Evolution - 2025 - Dowell - DNA State Influences the Uptake and Persistence of Environmental DNA by Marine.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (550kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Marine sponges as natural samplers of environmental DNA (eDNA) are receiving growing attention as an untapped source of biodiversity data. However, little is known about the state of DNA (e.g., cellular or extracellular) that is captured by these samples and how this compares to conventional aquatic eDNA samples. Here, we present an artificial spiking experiment where DNA in cellular and extracellular states was added into tanks containing two sponge species. Aquatic eDNA samples and sponge natural sampler DNA (nsDNA) samples were collected over 7 days and DNA from the two states was quantified in each sample using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). We found that there was a significant interaction between DNA state and sample type (eDNA and nsDNA), with lower detection and concentration of extracellular DNA, compared to cellular DNA, found in nsDNA samples. We also found that detection rate and concentration of DNA were significantly lower in nsDNA than in eDNA overall. During methodological testing, PCR inhibition was observed in both sponge species; this was prohibitive in one of the species. Further work to investigate the degree of PCR inhibition during nsDNA metabarcoding is important to understand its impact on the communities resolved using nsDNA methods. Synthesis and applications. We show that nsDNA may originate from a subset of the DNA present in environmental media, potentially providing a more stable picture of local communities. Natural samplers provide a promising option for hard-to-reach environments and for retrieving biodiversity data from archived samples; however, further work and optimization are required to understand what is and is not well represented by this sample type compared to widely applied aquatic eDNA approaches.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 41 Environmental Sciences; 31 Biological Sciences; 3103 Ecology; 14 Life Below Water; 0602 Ecology; 0603 Evolutionary Biology; 3103 Ecology; 3104 Evolutionary biology; 4102 Ecological applications |
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences |
Divisions: | Biological and Environmental Sciences (from Sep 19) |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Date of acceptance: | 16 January 2025 |
Date of first compliant Open Access: | 9 July 2025 |
Date Deposited: | 09 Jul 2025 09:48 |
Last Modified: | 09 Jul 2025 10:00 |
DOI or ID number: | 10.1002/ece3.70919 |
URI: | https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/26743 |
![]() |
View Item |