Lee, YY, Lam, S, Yeap, SP, Teng, KH, Yaseen, ZM, Shaw, A
ORCID: 0000-0001-5961-2464, Karunamoothei, V, Loh, YH and Teh, LS
(2025)
Borophene Oxide and Graphene Oxide for Renewable Energy: A Comparative Study on their Catalytic Performance in Sodium Borohydride Hydrolysis for Hydrogen Generation.
Chemnanomat, 11 (7).
ISSN 2199-692X
|
Text
Borophene oxide and graphene oxide for renewable energy.pdf - Accepted Version Access Restricted until 17 June 2026. Download (1MB) |
|
|
Text
Supporting Information Borophene oxide and graphene oxide for renewable energy.pdf - Supplemental Material Access Restricted until 17 June 2026. Download (759kB) |
Abstract
The recent rise of borophene as a new 2D material has triggered competition with the well-known graphene. The present work serves as the first attempt to compare the efficiency of borophene oxide (BO) and graphene oxide (GO) in catalyzing NaBH 4 hydrolysis for hydrogen generation. For a fair comparison, the BO and GO particles are synthesized using the same improved Hummers’ method. Morphological studies show that both BO and GO appear in plate-like shapes; however, GO exhibits a more scrunched and rippled structure with larger interlayer spacing. BO and GO exhibit more oxygen-containing groups than their bulk counterparts. X-ray diffraction analysis indicates that BO has a reduced crystallinity, while GO exhibits turbostratic disorder. Regarding catalytic properties, both BO and GO are found to be on par as catalysts, increasing hydrogen yield from NaBH hydrolysis by 25 times in 30 s, offering new insights for the clean energy industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: which has been published in final form at: Borophene Oxide and Graphene Oxide for Renewable Energy: A Comparative Study on their Catalytic Performance in Sodium Borohydride Hydrolysis for Hydrogen Generation, Chemnanomat, The Authors @ Wiley-VCH GmbH 2025 https://doi.org/10.1002/cnma.202500031. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 40 Engineering; 4016 Materials Engineering; 34 Chemical Sciences; 7 Affordable and Clean Energy; 13 Climate Action; 0303 Macromolecular and Materials Chemistry; 1007 Nanotechnology; 3403 Macromolecular and materials chemistry; 4018 Nanotechnology |
| Subjects: | T Technology > TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering |
| Divisions: | Civil Engineering and Built Environment |
| Publisher: | Wiley-VCH GmbH |
| Date of acceptance: | 26 May 2025 |
| Date Deposited: | 04 Nov 2025 10:17 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Nov 2025 10:30 |
| DOI or ID number: | 10.1002/cnma.202500031 |
| URI: | https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/27477 |
![]() |
View Item |
Export Citation
Export Citation