Facial reconstruction

Search LJMU Research Online

Browse Repository | Browse E-Theses

Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability

Mulliner, E, Maliene, V and Malys, N (2015) Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega, 59 (part B). pp. 146-156. ISSN 0305-0483

[img]
Preview
Text
Deposited _LJMU_Accepted_Manuscript_Mulliner et al Omega.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (790kB) | Preview
Figures 1-4
Preview
Image (Figures 1-4)
Figures_Mulliner et al 2015.pdf - Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (225kB) | Preview
Tables 1-6
Preview
Image (Tables 1-6)
Revision2_Tables_Mulliner et al 2015.pdf - Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (737kB) | Preview

Abstract

While affordability is traditionally assessed in economic terms, this paper tests a new assessment method that draws closer links with sustainability by considering economic, social and environmental criteria that impact on a household's quality of life. The paper presents an empirical application and comparison of six different multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches for the purpose of assessing sustainable housing affordability.The comparative performance of the weighted product model (WPM), the weighted sum model (WSM), the revised AHP, TOPSIS and COPRAS, is investigated. The purpose of the comparative analysis is to determine how different MCDM methods compare when used for a sustainable housing affordability assessment model. 20 Evaluative criteria and 10 alternative are as in Liverpool, England, were considered. The applicability of different MCDM methods for the focused decision problem was investigated. The paper discusses the similarities in MCDM methods, evaluates their robustness and contrasts the resulting rankings.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 1503 Business And Management, 1505 Marketing
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance
Divisions: Civil Engineering & Built Environment
Publisher: Elsevier
Date Deposited: 28 Jan 2016 12:16
Last Modified: 04 Sep 2021 13:32
DOI or ID number: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.013
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/2777
View Item View Item