How do people with fibromyalgia interpret ambiguous cues in empathy-related healthcare scenarios?

Alias, MP, Moore, DJ ORCID: 0000-0002-5228-3124, Fallon, N, Herron, K and Krahé, C ORCID: 0000-0002-0620-1263 (2025) How do people with fibromyalgia interpret ambiguous cues in empathy-related healthcare scenarios? The Journal of Pain. p. 106181. ISSN 1526-5900

Preview

Text 1-s2.0-S1526590025014087-main.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (865kB) | Preview

Abstract

Empathic communication is essential for high-quality healthcare, yet patients must often interpret subtle and ambiguous interpersonal cues during healthcare encounters. In such contexts, prior experiences and cognitive-affective processes may shape interpretation in biased ways. In Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS), a frequently stigmatised and 'invisible' condition, such biases may influence how patients perceive unclear messages from healthcare professionals. While interpretation bias for pain-related information has been explored, bias in interpreting social-emotional information has not. This study investigated interpretations of ambiguous social-emotional cues from healthcare professionals in individuals with FMS (n = 65), compared with those who have other chronic pain conditions (n = 51) and pain-free controls (n = 77). Participants completed a novel scenario-based task assessing the perceived likelihood of positive, neutral, and negative interpretations of ambiguous clinical situations. Validated self-report measures of psychological distress and perceived clinical empathy were also administered. Results showed that individuals with FMS were significantly more likely to endorse negative interpretations and less likely to endorse positive ones, relative to both comparison groups, even after controlling for depression, anxiety, and stress. The FMS group also reported greater psychological distress and lower perceived empathy. Moreover, negative interpretation bias was associated with greater distress and lower perceived clinical empathy, while positive bias showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that individuals with FMS interpret ambiguous healthcare communication through a distinct cognitive-affective lens. This highlights that patient-provider interactions are not experienced uniformly across chronic pain populations, and that interpretative biases should be considered to improve healthcare communication. PERSPECTIVE: We explored how individuals with fibromyalgia (compared to other chronic pain and pain-free groups) interpret empathy-related ambiguous cues from healthcare professionals. Controlling for psychological distress, the fibromyalgia group showed stronger negative interpretation biases than both comparison groups. Understanding these socio-cognitive patterns may help improve communication and empathy in fibromyalgia care.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Chronic Pain; Empathy; Fibromyalgia Syndrome; Healthcare Interactions; Interpretation Bias; 4202 Epidemiology; 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences; 3202 Clinical Sciences; 42 Health Sciences; Fibromyalgia; Mind and Body; Brain Disorders; Clinical Research; Pain Research; Mental Illness; Behavioral and Social Science; Chronic Pain; Mental Health; Neurosciences; Mental health; 4 Quality Education; 11 Medical and Health Sciences; 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences; Anesthesiology; 3202 Clinical sciences; 4202 Epidemiology
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Psychology (from Sep 2019)
Publisher:	Elsevier
Date of acceptance:	22 December 2025
Date of first compliant Open Access:	15 January 2026
Date Deposited:	15 Jan 2026 15:29
Last Modified:	15 Jan 2026 15:29
DOI or ID number:	10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106181
URI:	https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/27919

View Item