Gifted but Misunderstood? An Interpretive Systematic Review of Gifted Education Policy, Practice, And Socio-Emotional Experience in England

MISIR, SK and Thomas, M ORCID: 0000-0001-6451-4439 Gifted but Misunderstood? An Interpretive Systematic Review of Gifted Education Policy, Practice, And Socio-Emotional Experience in England. Journal of Intelligence. (Accepted)

Preview

Text jintelligence-4111718.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (735kB) | Preview

Abstract

This systematic mapping review analyses the evolution of gifted education in England between 2010 and 2025. The year 2010 serves as a critical turning point, characterized by the withdrawal of the national Gifted and Talented (G&T) policy and the subsequent delegation of identification and provision responsibilities to schools. This policy change created a gap in the literature due to a lack of focused synthesis examining the challenges and deficiencies that emerged during this new period. This study addresses this gap by aiming to bridge existing implementation gaps and provide a robust evidence base for future educational policies. The review focuses on policy frameworks, identification models, and socio-emotional outcomes Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, fifteen peer-reviewed studies retrieved from Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar were examined through thematic synthesis. Findings indicate a persistent gap between policy rhetoric and classroom practice. Identification processes remain heavily reliant on standardized testing and teacher judgment, often neglecting creativity, diversity, and contextual factors. Fragmented teacher training limits the ability to effectively support gifted learners, particularly those from disadvantaged or twice exceptional (2e) backgrounds. Socio-emotional outcomes reveal that academic success does not guarantee emotional well-being, highlighting the prevalence of perfectionism and stigmatization, underscoring the need for teachers and teacher educators to strengthen pre- and in-service training so they can better recognize diverse forms of giftedness and support students’ socio-emotional needs through more equitable and research-informed practices.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Liverpool Institute for Research in Education (LIFE); 1701 Psychology; 5201 Applied and developmental psychology; 5204 Cognitive and computational psychology; 5205 Social and personality psychology
Subjects:	L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
Divisions:	Education
Date of acceptance:	8 February 2026
Date of first compliant Open Access:	10 February 2026
Date Deposited:	10 Feb 2026 09:12
Last Modified:	10 Feb 2026 09:12
URI:	https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/28075

View Item