Policing the partnership: structural change, organisational legitimacy and police evaluations of probation in public protection

Millings, M orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-1870-9435, Robinson, G orcid iconORCID: 0000-0003-1207-0578, Annison, H orcid iconORCID: 0000-0001-6042-038X, Burke, L orcid iconORCID: 0000-0003-4379-9070 and Carr, N orcid iconORCID: 0000-0001-5060-7343 (2026) Policing the partnership: structural change, organisational legitimacy and police evaluations of probation in public protection. Policing and Society. pp. 1-18. ISSN 1043-9463

[thumbnail of Policing the partnership  structural change  organisational legitimacy and police evaluations of probation in public protection.pdf]
Preview
Text
Policing the partnership structural change organisational legitimacy and police evaluations of probation in public protection.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (690kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article explores how police actors perceive the probation service in the wake of its outsourcing and reunification during a decade of profound structural reform, offering a unique perspective on multi-agency collaboration within criminal justice. Drawing on interviews with senior leaders, frontline officers and staff immersed within partnership arrangements, the study examines how probation’s organisational legitimacy is evaluated from outside. Using the conceptual lens of organisational legitimacy, we reveal how legitimacy is experienced as transitional – shaped by professional encounters and institutional memory. Participants frequently described probation as a service in crisis, citing operational instability and diminished capacity as barriers to effective collaboration. Yet these critiques were tempered by reflections on probation’s enduring moral legitimacy, grounded in shared values and long-standing relationships. The failed Transforming Rehabilitation reforms of probation services emerged as a cautionary tale, sharpening police awareness of the fragility of interagency partnerships and fuelling anxieties about the marketisation of criminal justice. Despite concerns, many expressed cautious optimism about the reunification of probation services and reaffirmed their belief in public service collaboration as essential to public protection. This paper contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how legitimacy is co-constructed across organisational boundaries and how police perceptions illuminate the relational dynamics underpinning effective multi-agency work in criminal justice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 1602 Criminology; 1605 Policy and Administration; 1607 Social Work; 4407 Policy and administration; 4408 Political science
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology > HV7231 Criminal Justice Administrations
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology > HV7231 Criminal Justice Administrations > HV7551 Police. Detectives. Constabulary
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology > HV8301 Penology. Prisons. Corrections
Divisions: Law and Justice Studies
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Date of acceptance: 22 February 2026
Date of first compliant Open Access: 6 March 2026
Date Deposited: 06 Mar 2026 15:55
Last Modified: 06 Mar 2026 15:55
DOI or ID number: 10.1080/10439463.2026.2637550
URI: https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/28207
View Item View Item