Tools
Tools
Oxborough, D, Ghani, S, Harkness, A, Lloyd, G, Moody, W, Ring, L, Sandoval, J, Senior, R, Sheikh, N, Stout, M, Utomi, V, Willis, J, Zaidi, A and Steeds, R (2014) Impact of methodology and the use of allometric scaling on the echocardiographic assessment of the aortic root and arch: a study by the Research and Audit Sub-Committee of the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Research and Practice, 1 (1). ISSN 2055-0464
|
Text
Impact of methodology and the use of allometric scaling on the echocardiographic assessment of the aortic root and arch: a study by the Research and Audit Sub-Committee of the British Society of Echocardiography.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (423kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The aim of the study is to establish the impact of 2D echocardiographic methods on absolute values for aortic root dimensions and to describe any allometric relationship to body size. We adopted a nationwide cross-sectional prospective multicentre design using images obtained from studies utilising control groups or where specific normality was being assessed. A total of 248 participants were enrolled with no history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension or abnormal findings on echocardiography. Aortic root dimensions were measured at the annulus, the sinus of Valsalva, the sinotubular junction, the proximal ascending aorta and the aortic arch using the inner edge and leading edge methods in both diastole and systole by 2D echocardiography. All dimensions were scaled allometrically to body surface area (BSA), height and pulmonary artery diameter. For all parameters with the exception of the aortic annulus, dimensions were significantly larger in systole (P<0.05). All aortic root and arch measurements were significantly larger when measured using the leading edge method compared with the inner edge method (P<0.05). Allometric scaling provided a b exponent of BSA(0.6) in order to achieve size independence. Similarly, ratio scaling to height in subjects under the age of 40 years also produced size independence. In conclusion, the largest aortic dimensions occur in systole while using the leading edge method. Reproducibility of measurement, however, is better when assessing aortic dimensions in diastole. There is an allometric relationship to BSA and, therefore, allometric scaling in the order of BSA(0.6) provides a size-independent index that is not influenced by the age or gender.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 2D echocardiography; allometric scaling; aortic root |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine |
| Divisions: | Sport & Exercise Sciences |
| Publisher: | Bio Scientifica |
| Related URLs: | |
| Date Deposited: | 05 Apr 2018 09:58 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Sep 2021 10:36 |
| DOI or ID number: | 10.1530/ERP-14-0004 |
| URI: | https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/8415 |
 |
View Item |