Acute Effect of Alternative Complex-Contrast Training Set Strategies on Vertical Jump Propulsive Impulse and Rate of Force Development

Houlton, L, Moody, J, Bampouras, T ORCID: 0000-0002-8991-4655 and Esformes, J Acute Effect of Alternative Complex-Contrast Training Set Strategies on Vertical Jump Propulsive Impulse and Rate of Force Development. International Journal of Strength and Conditioning. (Accepted)

Preview

Text 20260203_Acute Effect of Alternative Complex-Contrast Training Set Strategies_Revised.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (563kB) | Preview

Abstract

Complex-contrast training (CCT) is an advanced training method that aims to augment explosive force application through post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE). However, the intra-contrast rest periods (ICRP) required to observe PAPE are typically too long (5-12 minutes), making CCT impractical for most training scenarios. This study, therefore, aimed to assess whether combining CCT with rest redistribution (RR) strategies could reduce the total contrast rest period (TCRP) required to observe PAPE in vertical jump metrics. Fifteen male subjects completed ten experimental interventions across five data collection sessions in a counterbalanced cross-sectional design. Interventions consisted of two vertical jump variations (countermovement jump (CMJ) and squat jump (SJ)) and five TCRPs (TCRP; 60, 120, 180, 240, 300s), partitioned as 0, 60, 120, 180, 240s ICRP, respectively, and 60s of RR. Within interventions, participants performed a control condition consisting of one set of vertical jumps (BASELINE), the assigned ICRP, then a second set of jumps (PRE-BS). This was followed by an experimental condition consisting of 3RM back squats with 30s between repetitions, then the ICRP, and a final set of jumps (POST-BS). Vertical jump propulsive impulse (JPROP) and related force-time components were assessed. A 5x2x2 (TCRP*CONDITION*TIME) repeated measures ANOVA assessed differences in force-time variables. Results showed no significant interaction of TCRP×CONDITION×TIME for JPROP, indicating that, regardless of intervention, neither CMJ nor SJ JPROP was enhanced. However, RR led to significant increases in both peak and average CMJ rate of force development (RFD) and reduced propulsion time (tPROP) after TCRP180, TCRP240, and TCRP300, demonstrating a more explosive, but not higher, jump. For SJ, no meaningful changes in RFD or tPROP were observed. Thus, RR may preserve JPROP while augmenting explosive force application via enhanced eccentric-concentric coupling and stretch-shortening cycle efficiency, but PAPE remains insufficient to increase jump height in recreationally strong populations. Practically, RR may reduce the time required within CCT sets to observe PAPE through enhanced RFD. This combined approach may also be an effective tool for increasing training density by maintaining explosive capacity during power phases without impairing performance. However, longer rest may still be necessary when maximising impulse is the primary goal.

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	Q Science > QP Physiology G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV561 Sports
Divisions:	Sport and Exercise Sciences
Publisher:	International Universities Strength and Conditioning Association
Date of acceptance:	4 February 2026
Date of first compliant Open Access:	6 February 2026
Date Deposited:	06 Feb 2026 08:34
Last Modified:	06 Feb 2026 08:34
URI:	https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/28054

View Item